브랜드별 브래지어 착용 맞음새와 패턴분석에 관한 연구

Abstract

본 연구는 20대 여대생의 브랜드별 브래지어 착용 맞음새와 패턴 분석에 관한 연구로 보다 우수한 브래지어 제품 개발을 위한 기초 자료를 제공하기 위하여 20대 여대생 200명을 대상으로 예비 조사를 실시하였다. 예비 조사를 통해 5개의 브랜드를 선정 하였으며 맞음새 적합성 검증을 위해 20대 여대생 10명을 대상으로 착의 평가를 실시하였고, 5명의 전문가 집단이 착장상태를 평가하는 관능검사를 직접 실시하였다. 설문조사에서는 착용 맞음새 만족도, 착용 맞음새 적합도, 신체 치수 변화 조사 등을 조사하였다. 연구내용에 따른 자료 분석은 SPSS 14.0 for Windows 사용하여 통계처리 하였으며, 분석방법은 기술통계와 빈도분석 등의 방법으로 분석하여 브랜드별 브래지어 착용 맞음새 및 패턴분석을 하였다. 이에 따른 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 브랜드별 브래지어 원형착용에 의한 신체 치수를 분석한 결과 착용 전 5개사 브랜드 브래지어의 항목 중 유두점 간격, 유방 안쪽 길이, 유방 바깥쪽 길이, 유방 하부길이는 착용 후와 별다른 차이를 보이지 않았다. 신체 치수 조사 항목 중 윗가슴 둘레와 가슴 둘레는 모두 증가하였으며, 밑가슴 둘레는 모두 감소하였다. 윗가슴 둘레와 가슴 둘레는 유방을 받쳐주는 와이어의 밀착도가 높아 유방을 봉긋하게 보이게 하여 증가하였으며, 전체적인 조임도가 높아 밑가슴 둘레가 감소하였다고 볼 수 있다. 2. 브래지어 원형착용에 의한 전체 브랜드 브래지어 착용 맞음새 만족도를 분석한 결과 B사 브랜드, C사 브랜드, D사 브랜드, E사 브랜드, A사 브랜드 순으로 나타났으며, 브래지어 원형착용에 의한 전체 브랜드 브래지어 착용 맞음새 적합도를 분석한 결과 C사 브랜드, B사 브랜드, A사 브랜드, D사 브랜드, E사 브랜드 순으로 나타났다. 3. 브래지어 관능검사에 의한 전체 브랜드 브래지어 착용 맞음새 만족도를 분석한 결과 B사 브랜드, E사 브랜드, C사 브랜드, A사 브랜드, D사 브랜드 순으로 나타났으며, 브래지어 관능검사에 의한 전체 브랜드 브래지어 착용 맞음새 적합도를 분석한 결과 E사 브랜드, B사 브랜드, C사 브랜드, A사 브랜드, D사 브랜드 순으로 나타났다. 4. 5개사 브랜드별 브래지어 패턴 간에 어떤 차이가 있는지 분석 한 결과, 가장 평균값에 가까운 패턴은 B사 브랜드였다. 날개 길이와 각도, 앞중심폭과 각도, 날개 위진동 및 날개쪽 컵둘레, Hook&Eye폭, 어깨끈 간격 설정에 있어서는 차이가 없었다. A사 브랜드와 E사 브랜드는 앞중심 높이가 낮았는데, 전중심상단이 낮아 전체적인 실루엣의 균형을 깨뜨려 착용감에 대한 만족도가 낮은 것으로 보인다. Keeper높이는 옆쪽의 피부를 잡아주어 가슴이 퍼지는 것을 방지하는 기능을 하는 것이다. A사 브랜드는 Keeper의 높이가 너무 낮아 잡아주는 힘이 없어 가슴의 살을 퍼지게 하였다. 기존에 있는 브랜드는 시각적으로 보여 지는 디자인의 변화가 있을 뿐, 대상 연령층의 신체치수 특성을 고려한 브래지어 생산호수 조절은 이루어지고 있지 않고 동일한 브래지어 호칭에 따르는 제품치수 또한 차이를 보이고 있다. 이에 우수한 제품생산을 위해서 체형차이 및 변화에 대한 여러 가지 문제점을 해결하고 치수규격을 보완하여야 하며 과학적이고 실증적인 연구가 필요하다.|This is a study on the fitness and pattern analysis in brassiere wearing in female undergraduates in their 20s. In order to offer basic data for product development in more excellent brassiere, the preliminary research was conducted targeting 200 female undergraduates in their 20s. Through the preliminary research, 5 brands were selected. In order to verify fitness appropriateness, the wearing evaluation was carried out targeting 10 female undergraduates in their 20s. The 5-expert group directly carried out the sensory inspection, which evaluates a wearing state. The questionnaire research was surveyed the satisfaction at wearing fitness, the appropriateness for the wearing fitness, and a change in body measurement. The data analysis according to the research contents was performed the statistical processing by using SPSS 14.0 for Windows. And, the analysis method was performed the fitness and pattern analysis in brassiere wearing by brand, through analyzing with the technical statistics and the frequency analysis. The research results according to this are as follows. 1. As a result of analyzing the body measurement by brassiere original-form wearing by brand, among 5-brand brassieres before wearing, the special difference wasn't indicated after wearing in bust-point space, inner bust length, outer bust length, and lower bust length. Among items in body measurement, both the upper bust girth and the bust girth increased. And, the lower bust girth all reduced. The upper bust girth and the bust girth were high in the fit of a wire, which supports a breast, thereby having increased by allowing a breast to be seemingly swollen. And, the overall tightening level is high, thereby being able to be seen that the lower bust girth reduced. 2. As a result of analyzing satisfaction at fitness in brassiere wearing of the whole brands by brassiere original-form wearing, it was indicated to be in order of B-company brand, C-company brand, D-company brand, E-company brand, and A-company brand. And, as a result of analyzing appropriateness for fitness in brassiere wearing of the whole brands by brassiere original-form wearing, it was indicated to be in order of C-company brand, B-company brand, A-company brand, D-company brand, and E-company brand. 3. As a result of analyzing satisfaction at fitness in brassiere wearing of the whole brands by brassiere sensory inspection, it was indicated to be in order of B-company brand, E-company brand, C-company brand, A-company brand, and D-company brand. And, as a result of analyzing appropriateness for fitness in brassiere wearing of the whole brands by brassiere sensory inspection, it was indicated to be in order of E-company brand, B-company brand, C-company brand, A-company brand, and D-company brand. 4. As a result of analyzing which difference there is between brassiere patterns by 5-company brands, the pattern, which is the closest to the mean value, was B-company brand. There was no difference in wing length and angle, frontal center width and angle, armhole over wing and cup girth to the wing, Hook & Eye width, shoulder-string space setting. A-company brand and E-company brand were low in the frontal center height. And, this is indicated that the overall central top is low, thereby seeming to lead to breaking the balance of the overall silhouette and to lowering satisfaction at a wearing sense. Height in keeper clutches the skin of the side, thereby functioning as preventing the spread of the bust. Regarding A-company brand, the height in keeper is so high and has no force of clutching, thereby having allowed the flesh of bust to be spread. The existing brand has just a visual change in design. The control in the measurement of producing brassiere is not made by considering characteristics of body measurement in the targeted age bracket. And, the product measurement according to the same brassiere name is also showing difference. Consequently, in order to produce excellent products, several problems need to be solved about the physical difference and change, and the measurement specification should be supplemented. And, a scientific and empirical research is needed. 4. As a result of analyzing which difference there is between brassiere patterns by 5-company brands, the pattern, which is the closest to the mean value, was B-company brand. There was no difference in wing length and angle, frontal center width and angle, armhole over wing and cup girth to the wing, Hook & Eye width, shoulder-string space setting. A-company brand and E-company brand were low in the frontal center height. And, this is indicated that the overall central top is low, thereby seeming to lead to breaking the balance of the overall silhouette and to lowering satisfaction at a wearing sense. Height in keeper clutches the skin of the side, thereby functioning as preventing the spread of the bust. Regarding A-company brand, the height in keeper is so high and has no force of clutching, thereby having allowed the flesh of bust to be spread. The existing brand has just a visual change in design. The control in the measurement of producing brassiere is not made by considering characteristics of body measurement in the targeted age bracket. And, the product measurement according to the same brassiere name is also showing difference. Consequently, in order to produce excellent products, several problems need to be solved about the physical difference and change, and the measurement specification should be supplemented. And, a scientific and empirical research is needed.