OAK

缺陷醫藥品의 製造物責任에 관한 硏究

Metadata Downloads
Alternative Title
A Study on the Product Liability of Defective Medicine
Abstract
According to the development of technology and highly industrialization various products have been produced, so our life become prosperous. But the more products become various, the more unexpected damages are increased. Therefore the legal principle that compensate consumer's damage due to defective product has developed.
First of all to compensate damage caused from defective product, consumers had attempted the legal principle of contract law and tort law. However, each principle was insufficient for remedy of damage because of its limitations. After all to overcome the traditional theories, the legal principle of product liability has developed.
The product liability is manufacturer's compensation for damages due to the lack of safety about products. It is to overcome the traditional principle of liability related to product. In these days many countries including Korea, the product liability has accepted through legislation.
By the way, in the modern industrial society, medicine is a typical industrial goods through an economic structure of mass production and mass consumption. Ordinary medicine is comprised in the bounds of product. So the generalization of product liability applies in case of defective medicine directly.
The defect is a requisite factor on the product liability for defective medicine, it means proper medicine is lacking of safety that is expecting ordinary. The defect is classified into manufacturing defect, design defect, warning defect, and the judgment of defects have to consider its type.
The consumer of medicine or pertinent user can claim damages to not only general manufacturers, but also importers, in name only manufacturers, doctors and pharmacists. And suppliers are secondary to them. Though in some cases the liability can be justified in view of policy.
When victims institute a lawsuit, they bear the burden of proof - existence of the defect, occurrence of damage, causal relationship. But it is very unfair to request the victim to prove the defect and cause. Because the manufacturers are more predominant position in technology and economy. So it is necessary to relieve the proof burden of the victims.
In case of lawsuit to guarantee the effectiveness about remedy of damage, it needs to introduce a class suit and to have to submit essential documents. Also it is necessary to make full use of the alternative dispute resolution actively. In addition to medicine manufacturers insure for liability insurance compulsorily.
Above all it is important to prevent the damage caused from defective medicine in advance. But that has realistic limitations. Therefore it needs to make an effective remedy after the fact through the product liability system. Especially it is imperative to make a legal regulation that considers a feature of medicine by special legislation.
Author(s)
임윤주
Issued Date
2007
Awarded Date
2007-08
Type
Dissertation
URI
https://repository.sungshin.ac.kr/handle/2025.oak/2132
http://210.125.93.15/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000004954
Alternative Author(s)
Im, Yoon-Ju
Affiliation
성신여자대학교 대학원
Department
일반대학원 법학과
Advisor
전광백
Table Of Contents
제1장 序論 = 1
제1절 硏究의 目的 = 1
제2절 硏究의 範圍 = 3
제2장 醫藥品의 缺陷으로 인한 損害의 發生 = 5
제1절 醫藥品의 意義 = 5
Ⅰ. 序說 = 5
Ⅱ. 藥事法 및 關聯法令의 規定 = 5
1. 醫藥品과의 區別槪念 = 5
2. 藥事法上 醫藥品의 槪念 = 7
Ⅲ. 醫藥品에 대한 判例의 態度 = 10
Ⅳ. 小結 = 11
제2절 缺陷醫藥品으로 인한 損害 = 12
Ⅰ. 序說 = 12
Ⅱ. 缺陷醫藥品으로 인한 損害의 特徵 = 13
1. 一般的인 特徵 = 13
2. 被害者側의 特徵 = 15
3. 加害行爲의 特徵 = 16
Ⅲ. 缺陷醫藥品에 대한 責任法理 = 16
제3장 製造物責任의 法理 = 18
제1절 製造物責任理論의 發展過程 = 18
Ⅰ. 序說 = 18
Ⅱ. 契約責任的 構成 = 19
1. 債務不履行責任 = 19
2. 瑕疵擔保責任 = 21
3. 契約責任的 構成의 限界 = 21
Ⅲ. 不法行爲責任的 構成 = 23
1. 一般不法行爲責任 = 23
2. 特殊不法行爲責任 = 24
3. 不法行爲責任的 構成의 限界 = 25
Ⅳ. 製造物責任理論의 確立 = 27
1. 法理論의 展開過程 = 27
2. 製造物責任의 法的性質 = 28
제2절 製造物責任의 比較法的 考察 = 30
Ⅰ. 美國 = 30
1. 製造物責任의 發展 = 30
2. 立法例 = 34
Ⅱ. 유럽 = 36
1. EC指針 = 36
2. 獨逸 = 37
3. 프랑스 = 38
Ⅲ. 日本 = 39
Ⅳ. 中國 = 39
제3절 우리나라의 製造物責任法 = 40
Ⅰ. 製造物責任法의 制定 = 40
1. 製造物責任法 制定前 判例의 態度 = 40
2. 製造物責任法의 立法化 = 42
3. 製造物責任法 制定의 效果 = 43
Ⅱ. 製造物責任法의 主要內容 = 46
1. 目的 = 46
2. 製造物의 範圍 = 46
3. 缺陷 = 47
4. 責任主體 = 47
5. 損害賠償 = 48
6. 免責事由 = 49
7. 消滅時效 = 49
제4장 缺陷醫藥品에 대한 製造物責任 = 51
제1절 序說 = 51
제2절 製造物로서의 醫藥品 = 51
Ⅰ. 醫藥品에 대한 立法例 = 51
Ⅱ. 製造物責任法의 適用對象 = 52
1. 製造物의 意義 = 52
2. 醫藥品의 製造物性 = 53
3. 醫藥品의 範圍 = 54
제3절 醫藥品의 缺陷 = 56
Ⅰ. 缺陷의 意義 = 56
1. 責任要件으로서의 缺陷 = 56
2. 缺陷의 槪念 = 56
Ⅱ. 缺陷의 類型 = 59
1. 製造上의 缺陷 = 59
2. 設計上의 缺陷 = 61
3. 表示上의 缺陷 = 63
Ⅲ. 缺陷의 判斷基準 = 66
1. 缺陷判斷基準에 관한 理論 = 66
2. 判例의 缺陷判斷基準 = 68
3. 製造物責任法의 缺陷判斷基準 = 69
Ⅳ. 缺陷의 判斷時期 = 72
제4절 製造物責任의 主體 = 73
Ⅰ. 損害賠償請求權者 = 73
Ⅱ. 責任主體의 範圍 = 73
1. 製造業者 = 74
2. 輸入業者 = 75
3. 表示製造業者 = 76
4. 供給業者 = 76
5. 醫師 및 藥師 = 77
Ⅲ. 多數의 責任主體間의 關係 = 78
제5절 免責事由 = 78
Ⅰ. 免責事由의 認定 = 78
Ⅱ. 免責事由의 內容 = 79
1. 製造物 不供給의 抗辯 = 79
2. 開發危險의 抗辯 = 80
3. 法令基準 遵守의 抗辯 = 81
4. 原材料 및 部品 製造業者의 抗辯 = 82
Ⅲ. 免責事由 主張의 制限 = 83
제6절 立證責任 = 85
Ⅰ. 製造物責任訴訟과 立證責任 = 85
1. 立證責任의 意義 = 85
2. 立證責任의 緩和必要性 = 86
Ⅱ. 缺陷의 立證 = 87
1. 缺陷存在의 立證責任 = 87
2. 缺陷立證의 緩和理論 = 88
Ⅲ. 因果關係의 立證 = 91
1. 因果關係의 立證責任 = 91
2. 因果關係立證의 緩和理論 = 92
제5장 缺陷醫藥品으로 인한 被害의 救濟 = 95
제1절 序說 = 95
제2절 藥事法上의 救濟 = 95
Ⅰ. 藥事法의 規定 = 95
Ⅱ. 具體的 內容 = 96
1. 모니터링制度 = 96
2. 리콜制度 = 97
3. 醫藥品副作用 被害救濟事業 = 98
제3절 司法的 救濟 = 99
Ⅰ. 民事訴訟을 통한 救濟 = 99
Ⅱ. 訴訟 關聯制度의 整備 = 100
1. 集團訴訟制度 = 100
2. 文書提出命令制度 = 103
3. 懲罰的 損害賠償制度 = 104
제4절 代替的 紛爭解決制度 = 107
Ⅰ. 意義 및 機能 = 107
Ⅱ. 類型 = 108
1. 調停 = 108
2. 和解 = 108
3. 仲裁 = 109
제5절 製造物責任保險制度의 活用 = 110
Ⅰ. 製造物責任保險의 意義 = 110
Ⅱ. 製造物責任保險의 機能 = 110
Ⅲ. 缺陷醫藥品과 製造物責任保險 = 111
1. 製造物責任保險의 必要性 = 111
2. 製造物責任保險의 加入義務化 方案 = 111
제6장 結論 = 113
參考文獻 = 116
ABSTRACT = 120
Degree
Master
Publisher
성신여자대학교 대학원
Appears in Collections:
법학과 > 학위논문
공개 및 라이선스
  • 공개 구분공개
  • 엠바고2007-11-12
파일 목록

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.