실재론 논쟁의 공허함에 대해 －진단, 처방, 대안－

Abstract

The claims that we should go beyond the field of realism-vs.-nonrealism debates are increasing but only considered as an opinion rather than inducing a radical change in the discussion of this area. To overcome this situation, we should (1) identify precisely what kind of realism debate is empty, (2) point out exactly where we begin to fall into this empty debate, and (3) show definitely what we would picture after being extricated from the empty discussion. This paper is going to suggest a method of going beyond those empty realism/nonrealism debates that satisfies these three conditions. This will be a full packaged program that comprises diagnosis, prescription, and an alternative. And to conclude, what is empty is the realism debates based on ``trans-empirical Subject``, the falling begins with excessive application of a concept and ends with complex question fallacy, and lastly my alternative picture is a minimal realism.